Penn State has initiated a pilot program of 10 wiki-based composition classes. Richard Doyle, Jeff Pruchnic, and Trey Conner, instructors in the pilot-program discussed their experiences this morning at the Computers & Writing Conference in Stanford. They found that students produce better work in a peer-reviewed environment. Grammar and mechanics are contextualized and there is greater motivation to create error-free work. Students read each other’s work, which forces them to consider their arguments carefully in order to avoid repeating someone else’s point.
They also found that the self-governing ecology of the networked wiki format creates a fruitful environment for discussion and debate. The wiki places control over the direction and duration of the discussion into the student’s hands. Richard Doyle also pointed out that there has not been a single editing war in the years that he has been teaching the course. He attributes the lack of unproductive “flame wars” to the amount of work his students have. Each student produces about 100 pages of material and must read, comment on, and GRADE their fellow students’ work. This is a learner-centered environment where, as Richard Doyle puts it, “the teacher acts as coach or zen master, making periodic interventions.” Doyle also points out that in these wiki-based courses, “students are learning how to interact in an information dense environment responsibly. They are being trained to deal with the fluid environments they are going to find themselves in.”
Daily Tribute
Here is a recap of significant posts in the edublogging community from the past 48 hours.
…
Is the learner centered environment really made possible by the existence of a networked environment? Is learner-centered even an appropriate way of thinking about this? There is no reason why such peer review cannot occur without the use of this technology, nor is there any reason why the role of teacher cannot be modified within the physical space of a classroom (architecture can never succeed at oppression no matter how riot proof it is.) What is the point of displacing the authority of the pedagogue if this space is simply filled with technology that is fully immersed in, and consequently inseparable from, a much more tyrannical form of surveillance? Don’t give it too much credit. The technology did not invent the model.