{"id":828,"date":"2006-11-03T18:00:05","date_gmt":"2006-11-03T18:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=828"},"modified":"2006-11-03T18:00:05","modified_gmt":"2006-11-03T18:00:05","slug":"an_encyclopedia_in_my_pocket","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2006\/11\/03\/an_encyclopedia_in_my_pocket\/","title":{"rendered":"an encyclopedia in my pocket"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A while back&nbsp;&ndash; last March&nbsp;&ndash; there was a great deal of excitement over <a href=\"http:\/\/encyclopodia.sourceforge.net\/en\/index.html\n\">Wikipodia<\/a>, an open source project to install Wikipedia on an iPod. Wanting a portable Wikipedia, I installed <a href=\"http:\/\/ipodlinux.org\/\">Linux<\/a> on my brand new video iPod, a necessary prerequisite, but was disappointed to discover that Wikipodia only worked on older iPods with smaller screens. I&#8217;ve waited for an update to Wikipodia since then, but the project seems to have gone dark. Probably Wikipodia wouldn&#8217;t have been an ideal solution anyway: it requires you to reboot your iPod into Linux whenever you want to look at Wikipedia. You could have an iPod to listen to music or a Wikipedia to read, but not both at the same time.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"ipodwikipedia.jpg\" src=\"\/blog\/archives\/ipodwikipedia.jpg\" width=\"240\" height=\"180\" align=\"right\" \/>But a partial fulfillment for my desire to have a portable Wikipedia has come along: Matt Swann has <a href=\"http:\/\/swannman.wordpress.com\/2006\/10\/01\/howto-read-wikipedia-on-an-ipod\/\n\">posted a script<\/a> that puts some of the Wikipedia on an iPod, in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.macworld.com\/2004\/09\/secrets\/septgeekfactor\/index.php\">iPod Notes<\/a> format. While it&#8217;s much simpler than installing a new operating system on your iPod, it&#8217;s still not for everybody&nbsp;&ndash; it requires using the OS X command line, although there&#8217;s an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.instructables.com\/id\/E6NUUTEWNUET9K4FCH\/?ALLSTEPS\n\">Automator-based version<\/a> that&#8217;s a bit simpler. (PC versions would seem to be available as well, though I don&#8217;t know anything about them&nbsp;&ndash; check the comments <a href=\"http:\/\/swannman.wordpress.com\/2006\/10\/01\/howto-read-wikipedia-on-an-ipod\/\">here<\/a>.) If you&#8217;re willing to take the plunge, you can feed the script a page from Wikipedia and it will start filling up your iPod Notes directory with that page and all the pages linked from it. I started from the entry for <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Book\n\">book<\/a>; the script downloaded this, then it downloaded the entries for <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paper\">paper<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Parchment\">parchment<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Page_%28paper%29\">page<\/a>, and so on. When it finished those, it downloads all the pages linked from the linked pages, and it keeps doing this until it runs out of space: regardless of iPod size, you can only have 1000 notes in the Notes directory. This doesn&#8217;t meant that you get 1000 articles. Because each iPod note can only be 4 kb long, entries that are longer than 4000 characters are split into multiple notes; thus, I wound up with only 216 entries. <\/p>\n<p>Though 216 entries is a tiny subset of Wikipedia, it&#8217;s still an interesting experience having a chunk of an encyclopedia in your pocket. What I find most captivating about approaching Wikipedia this was is that I found myself browsing interesting sounding articles rather than searching them directly. The iPod doesn&#8217;t have much input functionality: while you can scroll through the list of entries, you can&#8217;t search for a subject, as you usually would. (And with only 216 entries, searching would be of limited utility at best. The Wikipodia project promises full text searching, though text entry is a difficult proposition when you only have five keys to type with.) While you can scroll through the list of entries to find something that looks interesting, you&#8217;re likely to get sidetracked by something along the way. So you browse.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"monotyping.jpg\" src=\"\/blog\/archives\/monotyping.jpg\" width=\"240\" height=\"180\" align=\"left\" \/>To my mind, browsing is one of the primary virtues of a print encyclopedia: the arbitrary logic of alphabetization makes for a serendipitous reading experience, and you often come away from a print encyclopedia having read something in a nearby article that you didn&#8217;t intend to read. This is something that&#8217;s generally lost with online reference works: links between articles are supposed to make logical sense. This is also a reflection of our reading behavior: if I search for &#8220;book&#8221; in Wikipedia, I&#8217;m probably looking for something in particular. If I&#8217;m interested in book conservation issues, I might click on the link for <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Slow_fires\">slow fires<\/a>. If I&#8217;m interested in some other area related to books&nbsp;&ndash; how to make vellum, for example&nbsp;&ndash; I almost certainly wouldn&#8217;t. Instead I&#8217;d click on the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Vellum_parchment\">vellum<\/a> link and keep looking from there. We tend to  be goal-directed when we using Wikipedia online: it&#8217;s like going to a library and finding the specific book you want. Wandering in a library is an equally valid behavior: that&#8217;s what happens here.<\/p>\n<p>Because you&#8217;re not looking for a particular piece of information, you do find yourself reading in a different way. Search-based reading is a different style of reading than browsing, which is slower and more casual. This has a downside when applied to Wikipedia: the often atrocious style is more glaring when you&#8217;re reading for pleasure rather than reading for information. And an offline Wikipedia inhibits some of the new reading habits Wikipedia encourages. I caught myself wondering how biased the declarations of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Shahnameh\">Sh&#257;hn&#257;ma<\/a>&#8216;s originality w\/r\/t other national epics were; without recourse to page histories and talk pages I&#8217;m left to wonder until I find myself with an Internet connection.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" align=\"right\" alt=\"book-bookwhite.jpg\" src=\"\/blog\/archives\/book-bookwhite.jpg\" width=\"240\" height=\"180\" \/>The experience of reading Wikipedia this way isn&#8217;t perfect: many links don&#8217;t work, and some articles seem to arbitrarily end, some in mid-sentence, some in mid-word. You also realize how many links in Wikipedia aren&#8217;t useful at all. If I&#8217;m interested in books as a concept, I&#8217;m probably not interested in <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/1907\">1907<\/a> as a concept, though that is the year that <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Marc_Aurel_Stein\">Marc Aurel Stein<\/a> found <i>The Diamond Sutra<\/i>, the oldest known block-printed book. Marc Aurel Stein or <i>The Diamond Sutra<\/i> might be interesting subjects to a book-inclined browser; 1907 isn&#8217;t as likely. What you get on your iPod is an arbitrary selection. But there&#8217;s something very pleasant about this: it&#8217;s nice to have the chance to learn about both <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Neferirkare_Kakai\"> Neferirkare Kakai <\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rule_of_St_Benedict\">Rule of St. Benedict<\/a> on the subway.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A while back&nbsp;&ndash; last March&nbsp;&ndash; there was a great deal of excitement over Wikipodia, an open source project to install Wikipedia on an iPod. Wanting a portable Wikipedia, I installed Linux on my brand new video iPod, a necessary prerequisite, but was disappointed to discover that Wikipodia only worked on older iPods with smaller screens. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[223,901,1576,2016],"tags":[3159,3280,3422,3508],"class_list":["post-828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-browsing","category-ipod","category-reading","category-wikipedia","tag-browsing","tag-ipod","tag-reading","tag-wikipedia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/828\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}