{"id":748,"date":"2006-08-10T06:49:42","date_gmt":"2006-08-10T06:49:42","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=748"},"modified":"2006-08-10T06:49:42","modified_gmt":"2006-08-10T06:49:42","slug":"uc_offers_up_stacks_to_google","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2006\/08\/10\/uc_offers_up_stacks_to_google\/","title":{"rendered":"u.c. offers up stacks to google"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\"APTFrontPage.jpg\"
The APT BookScan 1200<\/a>. Not what Google and OCA are using (their scanners are human-assisted), just a cool photo.<\/i><\/center><\/div>\n

Less than two months after reaching a deal<\/a> with Microsoft, the University of California has agreed<\/a> to let Google scan its vast holdings (over 34 million volumes) into the Book Search database. Google will undoubtedly dig deeper into the holdings of the ten-campus system’s 100-plus libraries than Microsoft, which is a member of the more copyright-cautious Open Content Alliance<\/a>, and will focus primarily on books unambiguously in the public domain. The Google-UC alliance comes as major lawsuits against Google from the Authors Guild and Association of American Publishers are still in the evidence-gathering phase.
\nMeanwhile, across the drink, French publishing group La Martiniè\tre in June brought suit<\/a> against Google for “counterfeiting and breach of intellectual property rights.” Pretty much the same claim as the American industry plaintiffs. Later that month, however, German publishing conglomerate WBG dropped a petition<\/a> for a preliminary injunction against Google after a Hamburg court told them that they probably wouldn’t win. So what might the future hold? The European crystal ball is murky at best.
\nDuring this period of uncertainty, the OCA seems content to let Google be the legal lightning rod. If Google prevails, however, Microsoft and Yahoo will have a lot of catching up to do in stocking their book databases. But the two efforts may not be in such close competition as it would initially seem.
\nGoogle’s library initiative is an extremely bold commercial gambit. If it wins its cases, it stands to make a great deal of money, even after the tens of millions it is spending on the scanning and indexing the billions of pages, off a tiny commodity: the text snippet. But far from being the seed of a new literary remix culture, as Kevin Kelly would have us believe<\/a> (and John Updike would have us lament<\/a>), the snippet is simply an advertising hook for a vast ad network. Google’s not the Library of Babel, it’s the most sublimely sophisticated advertising company the world has ever seen (see this funny reflection on “snippet-dangling”<\/a>). The OCA, on the other hand, is aimed at creating a legitimate online library, where books are not a means for profit, but an end in themselves.
\nBrewster Kahle<\/a>, the founder and leader of the OCA, has a rather immodest aim: “to build the great library.” “That was the goal I set for myself 25 years ago,” he told The San Francisco Chronicle in a profile<\/a> last year. “It is now technically possible to live up to the dream of the Library of Alexandria.”
\nSo while Google’s venture may be more daring, more outrageous, more exhaustive, more — you name it –, the OCA may, in its slow, cautious, more idealistic way, be building the foundations of something far more important and useful. Plus, Kahle’s got the Bookmobile<\/a>. How can you not love the Bookmobile?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The APT BookScan 1200. Not what Google and OCA are using (their scanners are human-assisted), just a cool photo. Less than two months after reaching a deal with Microsoft, the University of California has agreed to let Google scan its vast holdings (over 34 million volumes) into the Book Search database. Google will undoubtedly dig […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,213,395,498,549,755,759,1062,1188,1338,1546,1676,1722],"tags":[2626],"class_list":["post-748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-brewster_kahle","category-copyright","category-digitization","category-ebooks","category-google","category-google_book_search","category-library","category-microsoft","category-oca","category-publishing","category-search","category-snippet","tag-library-google-google_book_search-oca-brewster_kahle-copyright-microsoft-digitization-search-publishing-snippet-books-ebooks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/748\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}