{"id":546,"date":"2006-01-17T18:12:43","date_gmt":"2006-01-17T18:12:43","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=546"},"modified":"2006-01-17T18:12:43","modified_gmt":"2006-01-17T18:12:43","slug":"who_do_you_trust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2006\/01\/17\/who_do_you_trust\/","title":{"rendered":"who do you trust?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Larry Sanger posted this comment to if:book&#8217;s recent <a href=\"\/blog\/archives\/2006\/01\/digital_univers.html\">Digital Universe and expert review<\/a> post. In the second paragraph Sanger suggests that experts should not have to constantly prove the value of their expertise.  We think this is a crucial question. What do you think?<br \/>\n&#8220;In its first year or two it was very much not the case that Wikipedia &#8220;only looks at reputation that has been built up within Wikipedia.&#8221; We used to show respect to well-qualified people as soon as they showed up. In fact, it&#8217;s very sad that it has changed in that way, because that means that Wikipedia has become insular&#8211;and it has, too. (And in fact, I warned very specifically against this insularity. I knew it would rear its ugly head unless we worked against it.) Worse, Wikipedia&#8217;s notion of expertise depends on how well you work within that system&#8211;which has nothing whatsoever to do with how well you know a subject.<br \/>\n&#8220;That&#8217;s what expertise is, after all: knowing a lot about a subject. It seems that any project in which you have to &#8220;prove&#8221; that you know a lot about a subject, to people who don&#8217;t know a lot about the subject, will endlessly struggle to attract society&#8217;s knowledge leaders.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Larry Sanger posted this comment to if:book&#8217;s recent Digital Universe and expert review post. In the second paragraph Sanger suggests that experts should not have to constantly prove the value of their expertise. We think this is a crucial question. What do you think? &#8220;In its first year or two it was very much not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,114,412,496,590,631,633,2016],"tags":[3057],"class_list":["post-546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-academia","category-authority","category-credibility","category-digital_universe","category-encyclopedia","category-expert","category-expert_review","category-wikipedia","tag-wikipedia-encyclopedia-authority-credibility-academia-expert-expert_review-digital_universe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=546"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}