{"id":468,"date":"2005-11-30T10:49:39","date_gmt":"2005-11-30T10:49:39","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=468"},"modified":"2005-11-30T10:49:39","modified_gmt":"2005-11-30T10:49:39","slug":"chicago_tribune_on_elit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2005\/11\/30\/chicago_tribune_on_elit\/","title":{"rendered":"chicago tribune on e-lit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A November 27 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/technology\/chi-0511260138nov27,1,480382.story?coll=chi-technology-hedL\">Chicago Tribune article <\/a> by Julia Keller bundles together hypertext fiction, blogging, texting, and new electronic distribution methods for books under a discussion of &#8220;e-literature.&#8221;  Interviewing Scott Rettberg (of <a href=\"http:\/\/grandtextauto.gatech.edu\/\">Grand Text Auto<\/a>) and <a href=\"http:\/\/web.media.mit.edu\/~wjm\/\">MIT&#8217;s William J. Mitchell<\/a>, the reporter argues that the hallmark of e-literature is increased consumer control over the shape and content of a book:<br \/>\n<i>Literature, like all genres, is being reimagined and remade by the constantly unfolding extravagance of technological advances. The question of who&#8217;s in charge &#8212; the producer or the consumer &#8212; is increasingly relevant to the literary world. The idea of the book as an inert entity is gradually giving way to the idea of the book as a fluid, formless repository for an ever-changing variety of words and ideas by a constantly modified cast of writers.<\/i><br \/>\nA fluid, formless repository?  Ever-changing words?  This is the Ipod version of the future of literature, and I&#8217;m having a hard time articulating why I find it disturbing. It might be the idea that the digitized literature will bring about a sort of consumer revolution.  I can&#8217;t help but think of this idea as a strange rearticulation of the Marxist rhetoric of the Language Poets, a group of experimental writers who claimed to give the reader a greater role in the production process of a literary work as part of critique of capitalism (more on this <a href=\"http:\/\/www.writing.upenn.edu\/~afilreis\/88\/hartley.html\">here<\/a>).  In the Ipod model of e-literature, readers don&#8217;t challenge the capitalist sytem: they are consumers, <i>empowered<\/i> by their purchasing power.<br \/>\nThere&#8217;s also a a contradiction in the article itself: Keller&#8217;s evolutionary narrative, in which the &#8220;inert book&#8221; slowly becomes an obsolete concept, is undermined by her last paragraphs.  She ends the article by quoting Mitchell, who insists that there will always be a place for &#8220;traditional paper-based literature&#8221; because a book &#8220;feels good, looks good &#8212; it really works.&#8221;  This gets us back to <a href=\"\/blog\/archives\/2005\/11\/malcom_gladwell.html\">Malcolm Gladwell<\/a> territory: is it true that paper books will always seem to work better than digital ones?  Or is it just too difficult to think beyond what &#8220;feels good&#8221; right now?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A November 27 Chicago Tribune article by Julia Keller bundles together hypertext fiction, blogging, texting, and new electronic distribution methods for books under a discussion of &#8220;e-literature.&#8221; Interviewing Scott Rettberg (of Grand Text Auto) and MIT&#8217;s William J. Mitchell, the reporter argues that the hallmark of e-literature is increased consumer control over the shape and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[168,538,850,1546],"tags":[3147,3224,3267,3413],"class_list":["post-468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogging","category-e-books","category-hypertext","category-publishing","tag-blogging","tag-e-books","tag-hypertext","tag-publishing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}