{"id":31,"date":"2004-12-22T15:05:46","date_gmt":"2004-12-22T15:05:46","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=31"},"modified":"2004-12-22T15:05:46","modified_gmt":"2004-12-22T15:05:46","slug":"p2p_for_profit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2004\/12\/22\/p2p_for_profit\/","title":{"rendered":"p2p for profit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A18568-2004Dec22.html?referrer=email\">The Washington Post<\/a><\/b> reports that <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mashboxx.com\/\">mashboxx<\/a><\/b>, the latest venture of <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grokster.com\/\">Grokster<\/a><\/b> president Wayne Rosso, intends to &#8220;clean up and legitimize&#8221; peer-to-peer music file sharing on the Internet, and to give record companies a piece of the pie (in spite of Rosso&#8217;s past demonization of said companies). Mashboxx will employ <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.snocap.com\/\">SnoCap<\/a><\/b> &#8211; a &#8220;copyright management interface&#8221; technology developed by Napster creator Shawn Fanning, enabling copyright owners to trace the movement of files containing their content, and to extract fees from the people sharing them. SnoCap essentially &#8220;fingerprints&#8221; files so that content owners can keep track of them and set the rules and rates of their trading.<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"snocap.jpg\" src=\"\/blog\/archives\/snocap.jpg\" width=\"109\" height=\"30\" align=\"RIGHT\"\/> I suspect that the rates will be too high, of the dollar-a-song variety, which seems downright exploitative given the ease and inherent cheapness of p2p networks. While I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic that the mashboxx move presages an eventual overhaul of the music industry, and may be a small step toward reconciling copyright concerns with networked <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.freeculture.org\/\">free culture<\/a><\/b>, this seems more like a hostile move to squeeze music sharers. Given the scale of the p2p phenomenon, a nickel-a-song could amount to sizeable profits. Remember: it&#8217;s no longer about a single point of sale, but multiple points of exchange. But the recording industry is a rapacious animal, and is loathe to believe that it can actually make profit without extortion. Remember <b><a href=\"\/blog\/archives\/2004\/12\/lizards_defying.html\">the long tail<\/a><\/b>&#8230;<br \/>\nAnd this issue doesn&#8217;t just pertain to music sharing. As ebooks become a more frequently trafficked commodity on p2p networks, we will see the same struggle arise. Already, questions abound about <b><a href=\"\/blog\/archives\/2004\/12\/books_behind_ba.html\">Google&#8217;s library initiative<\/a><\/b> and readers&#8217; access to copyrighted texts. And the <b><a href=\"\/blog\/archives\/2004\/12\/nypl_ebook_coll.html\">New York Public Library<\/a><\/b> seems to think that ebooks are a threat that must be subdued before all hell breaks loose.<br \/>\n<b><a title=\"Technology News: Technology: Fanning's Snocap Builds Bridge Between Labels and P2P\" href=\"http:\/\/www.technewsworld.com\/story\/Fannings-Snocap-Builds-Bridge-Between-Labels-and-P2P-38664.html\">Technology News: Technology: Fanning&#8217;s Snocap Builds Bridge Between Labels and P2P<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Washington Post reports that mashboxx, the latest venture of Grokster president Wayne Rosso, intends to &#8220;clean up and legitimize&#8221; peer-to-peer music file sharing on the Internet, and to give record companies a piece of the pie (in spite of Rosso&#8217;s past demonization of said companies). Mashboxx will employ SnoCap &#8211; a &#8220;copyright management interface&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[396],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-copyright-and-copyleft"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}