{"id":286,"date":"2005-08-10T15:42:08","date_gmt":"2005-08-10T15:42:08","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=286"},"modified":"2005-08-10T15:42:08","modified_gmt":"2005-08-10T15:42:08","slug":"tired_of_feeling_so_used_textb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2005\/08\/10\/tired_of_feeling_so_used_textb\/","title":{"rendered":"tired of feeling so used, textbook publishers go digital"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CNET News <a href=\"http:\/\/news.com.com\/Coming+to+campus+E-books+with+expiration+dates\/2100-1025_3-5825301.html\">reports<\/a> that ten schools, including Princeton, the University of Oregon, and the University of Utah, are to participate this fall in a trial program in which college bookstores will offer digital editions of high-demand titles at a 33% mark-down from print prices. <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"used150blue.gif\" img style=\"margin:12px;\" src=\"\/blog\/archives\/used150blue.gif\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" align=\"right\"\/> In exchange for these enormous savings, students get to download one, intensely straight-jacketed .pdf file &#8211; a book that is readable on only one machine, cannot be printed out in full, and will expire after 150 days.<br \/>\nSome of America&#8217;s biggest textbook publishers, including McGraw-Hill, Houghton Mifflin, John Wiley &#038; Sons, and Thomson Learning are offering digital titles in the program through wholesaler <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mbsbooks.com\/Index.htm\">MBS Textbook Exchange<\/a>. Their aim? To tempt cash-strapped students away from used textbooks, the bane of the textbook industry. All in all, it&#8217;s a cynical move that implicitly acknowledges the absurdly inflated price of print textbooks, yet offers only token relief, trying to pass off <a href=\"\/blog\/archives\/2005\/05\/drm_cripples_bo.html\">self-destructing<\/a>, digital facsimiles as a reasonable substitute for a perfectly durable, slightly dinged used book.<br \/>\nWhat the textbook publishers ought to be doing is cultivating a more creative vision of the digital textbook, and getting over their terror of online distribution, which they can only see as an intellectual property disaster. Textbook publishers should take a look around and see that there are ways to make good business online. Charge for the service, not the copy &#8211; explore syndicated content that students can subscribe to at reasonable rates. Develop new kinds of multimedia titles that can truly take advantage of the online environment. Stop spending millions on digital rights management, stop worrying about your precious copies getting stolen.<br \/>\nOn the web, everything is a copy, and it&#8217;s pointless trying to police this reality. What&#8217;s meaningful is access, what&#8217;s meaningful is staying up to date. Develop a good service, with consistently updated, valuable content, and students and professors will buy in. If the textbook industry does not wake up and adapt, they could find themselves in the ash heap. More on that to come.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CNET News reports that ten schools, including Princeton, the University of Oregon, and the University of Utah, are to participate this fall in a trial program in which college bookstores will offer digital editions of high-demand titles at a 33% mark-down from print prices. In exchange for these enormous savings, students get to download one, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[396,561],"tags":[2355],"class_list":["post-286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-copyright-and-copyleft","category-education","tag-ebook-e-book-textbook-education-publishing-education-classroom-book-books-pdf-drm-copyright-copyleft"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}