{"id":1331,"date":"2009-02-05T14:34:51","date_gmt":"2009-02-05T14:34:51","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=1331"},"modified":"2009-02-05T14:34:51","modified_gmt":"2009-02-05T14:34:51","slug":"judging_a_book_by_its_writing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2009\/02\/05\/judging_a_book_by_its_writing\/","title":{"rendered":"judging a book by its contents"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/theharperstudio.com\/2009\/02\/stephen-king-vs-stephanie-meyer-can-a-book-be-deemed-%E2%80%9Cgood%E2%80%9D-or-%E2%80%9Cbad%E2%80%9D-based-solely-on-the-writing\/\">post<\/a> at the Harper Studio blog about Stephen King&#8217;s recent denigration of Stephenie Meyer&#8217;s talents as a writer. Meyer is, of course, the author of the <em>Twilight<\/em> books, a chaste vampire saga. The post asks:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Can a book be deemed &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;bad&#8221; based solely of the quality of its writing?<\/p>\n<p>I haven&#8217;t read the Twilight books so I can&#8217;t weigh in on King&#8217;s assessment. But it seems to me that Stephenie Meyer has activated something profound in people- mostly teenage girls &#8211; and the ability to do that may be as rare as the literary gifts of a writer like&#8230; Stephen King.  Put another way: In terms of literary merit, Twilight may not be &#8220;good,&#8221; but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not great.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I have not read these books, though people whose taste in writing I trust more than Stephen King&#8217;s have assured me that the writing is abysmal. I have been repeatedly entertained by having <a href=\"http:\/\/stoney321.livejournal.com\/317176.html\">what goes on in these books<\/a> described to me; I have also seen the movie based upon the first of them, which I found quite thoroughly astonishing. From my perspective, it seems clear that these books are a Jesse Helms-level assault on American morality. It&#8217;s tempting to pull out Theodor Adorno, <em>b&ecirc;te noire<\/em> of the blogosphere: should you need a fix, his miniature essay <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=ZiD-I5vX-oMC&#038;pg=PA101&#038;dq=adorno+minima+moralia+%22a+writer+will+find+that+the+more+precisely%22&#038;ei=8z6LSfSgNILeyASg3qm6BQ\">&#8220;Morality and Style&#8221;<\/a>, from <em>Minima Moralia<\/em>, will do the trick nicely.<br \/>\nBut I&#8217;m interested not so much in <em>Twilight<\/em>&#8216;s merit but in the attitude toward books that&#8217;s on display in this post. Books can be many things, but by this argument they stand mostly as commodity: <em>Twilight<\/em> is culturally valuable not because of anything that it might be saying&nbsp;&ndash; or the method in which it&#8217;s said&nbsp;&ndash; but because it&#8217;s reached a lot of people. By this reductionist perspective, <em>Twilight<\/em> might as well be a movie or a videogame as a book. And I think it&#8217;s this sort of thinking which is causing the downfall of publishing: for big publishers, a great book is simply one that sells a lot of copies. This is an attitude which makes sense to the people in charge of the numbers at a big publishing house, but I&#8217;m not sure that it plays so well with consumers. I can&#8217;t imagine that anyone&nbsp;&ndash; beside their employees&nbsp;&ndash; would be particularly upset if Hachette (publishers of <em>Twilight<\/em>) goes under. If a book is just a vehicle for the consumer to get content as quickly as possible, another vehicle can easily be found.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s a post at the Harper Studio blog about Stephen King&#8217;s recent denigration of Stephenie Meyer&#8217;s talents as a writer. Meyer is, of course, the author of the Twilight books, a chaste vampire saga. The post asks: Can a book be deemed &#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;bad&#8221; based solely of the quality of its writing? I haven&#8217;t [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1331"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1331\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}