{"id":132,"date":"2005-04-11T13:15:34","date_gmt":"2005-04-11T13:15:34","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=132"},"modified":"2005-04-11T13:15:34","modified_gmt":"2005-04-11T13:15:34","slug":"out_of_print_is_out_of_date","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2005\/04\/11\/out_of_print_is_out_of_date\/","title":{"rendered":"out of print is out of date"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Amazon.com has recently acquired <a href=\"http:\/\/www.booksurge.com\/index.html\">BookSurge<\/a>, the self-described &#8220;global leader in inventory-free book publishing, printing, fulfillment and distribution.&#8221; This adds cutting edge print-on-demand technology to Amazon&#8217;s online retailing recipe &#8211; big news for self-published authors, but even bigger news for readers. Amazon&#8217;s move suggests that print-on-demand might finally be maturing out of the terrible twos of the vanity press into a technology that redefines publishing in space and time. Imagine rare books suddenly coming back into print, and newer books staying in print longer, or indefinitely. Every book, no matter how old or obscure, could theoretically be in print, in perpetuity. Amazon already sells out-of-print or hard-to-obtain titles produced on demand by BookSurge, but their absorbing the company signals a definitive step futher into <a href=\"\/blog\/archives\/2004\/12\/lizards_defying.html\">long tail<\/a> bookselling. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.computing.co.uk\/news\/1162312\">article<\/a>)<br \/>\nThe backbone of any serious publishing house used to be its backlist &#8211; the large catalogue of older titles that sell reliably over time and are therefore kept in print. A backlist might include classics by the country&#8217;s most important authors, or books with more modest readership that still sell consistently over the years. It&#8217;s like the publisher&#8217;s DNA &#8211; a map of who they really are. On occasion, you have a runaway bestseller, and you rejoice, but it&#8217;s not something you count on. It&#8217;s the sturdy, distinguished backlist that keeps a publisher grounded. Today we have the opposite. Most publishing houses have merged under large media conglomerates, backlists have dwindled, and publishers are ever more obsessed with finding their next blockbuster hit &#8211; a Dan Brown or Sue Grafton. Books quickly go out of print, and many more &#8211; books that might have found a smaller, more select readership &#8211; probably never see the light of day since publishers aren&#8217;t willing to take on the cost and risk of a smaller print run.<br \/>\nBut as Greg Geeley, Amazon.com media products vice president, puts it:<br \/>\n<i>&#8220;Print-on-demand has changed the economics of small-quantity printing, making it possible for books with low and uncertain demand to be profitably produced&#8230; Thanks to print-on-demand, &#8216;out of print&#8217; is out of date.&#8221;<\/i><br \/>\nPeople have been talking for some time about the internet&#8217;s potential to sweep away the stagnation of mainstream publishing. Amazon has already changed the way we browse, buy and discuss books. Now, with machines that can turn out a single book at a time, indistinguishable in appearance and quality from a regular trade paperback or even hardcover, no title need ever go out of print, and publishers might finally be able to direct their attention away from quantity and back to quality.<br \/>\n<i>For further reading&#8230;<\/p>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nybooks.com\/articles\/14318\">Jason Epstein in New York Review of Books<\/a>, 2001\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/longtail.typepad.com\/the_long_tail\/\">Chris Anderson&#8217;s Long Tail blog<\/a><\/i><br \/>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Print-on-demand might finally be maturing out of the terrible twos of the vanity press into a technology that redefines publishing in space and time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[730],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-132","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}