{"id":1202,"date":"2008-03-07T02:43:34","date_gmt":"2008-03-07T02:43:34","guid":{"rendered":"\/ifbookblog\/?p=1202"},"modified":"2008-03-07T02:43:34","modified_gmt":"2008-03-07T02:43:34","slug":"nicholson_baker_on_the_charms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/2008\/03\/07\/nicholson_baker_on_the_charms\/","title":{"rendered":"nicholson baker on the charms of wikipedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I finally got around to reading Nicholson Baker&#8217;s essay in the New York Review of Books, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nybooks.com\/articles\/21131\">&#8220;The Charms of Wikipedia,&#8221;<\/a> and it&#8217;s&#8230; charming. Baker has a flair for idiosyncratic detail, which makes him a particularly perceptive and entertaining guide through the social and procedural byways of the Wikipedia mole hill. Of particular interest are his delvings into the early Wikipedia&#8217;s reliance on public domain reference works, most notably the famous 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica: &#8220;The fragments from original sources persist like those stony bits of classical buildings incorporated in a medieval wall.&#8221;<br \/>\nBaker also has some smart things to say on the subject of vandalism:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Wikipedians see vandalism as a problem, and it certainly can be, but a Diogenes-minded observer would submit that Wikipedia would never have been the prodigious success it has been without its demons.<br \/>\nThis is a reference book that can suddenly go nasty on you. Who knows whether, when you look up Harvard&#8217;s one-time warrior-president, James Bryant Conant, you&#8217;re going to get a bland, evenhanded article about him, or whether the whole page will read (as it did for seventeen minutes on April 26, 2006): &#8220;HES A BIG STUPID HEAD.&#8221; James Conant was, after all, in some important ways, a big stupid head. He was studiously anti-Semitic, a strong believer in wonder-weapons &#8211; ?\u009da man who was quite as happy figuring out new ways to kill people as he was administering a great university. Without the kooks and the insulters and the spray-can taggers, Wikipedia would just be the most useful encyclopedia ever made. Instead it&#8217;s a fast-paced game of paintball.<br \/>\nNot only does Wikipedia need its vandals &#8211; ?\u009dup to a point &#8211; ?\u009dthe vandals need an orderly Wikipedia, too. Without order, their culture-jamming lacks a context. If Wikipedia were rendered entirely chaotic and obscene, there would be no joy in, for example, replacing some of the article on Archimedes with this:<br \/>\nArchimedes is dead.<br \/>\nHe died.<br \/>\nOther people will also die.<br \/>\nAll hail chickens.<br \/>\nThe Power Rangers say &#8220;Hi&#8221;<br \/>\nThe End.<br \/>\nEven the interesting article on culture jamming has been hit a few times: &#8220;Culture jamming,&#8221; it said in May 2007, &#8220;is the act of jamming tons of cultures into 1 extremely hot room.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I finally got around to reading Nicholson Baker&#8217;s essay in the New York Review of Books, &#8220;The Charms of Wikipedia,&#8221; and it&#8217;s&#8230; charming. Baker has a flair for idiosyncratic detail, which makes him a particularly perceptive and entertaining guide through the social and procedural byways of the Wikipedia mole hill. Of particular interest are his [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[590,1541,2016],"tags":[3058],"class_list":["post-1202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-encyclopedia","category-publicdomain","category-wikipedia","tag-wikipedia-encyclopedia-publicdomain"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/futureofthebook.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}