The third level begins. Where the topographic develops one dimension of telegraphy — its flow of information across space — the topological develops the other — its intricate coding and addressing. Where the topographic is an analog flow; the topological is the digital divide. It is a line of another type. It is a line of a new type which, for a brief, burning moment, reignited the dreams of a new topos. But the cycle accelerates. If it took twenty years to get from Brecht or Benjamin’s optimism to Debord’s foreclosure, the same cycle in net time took perhaps five years. Geert Lovink: “Cyberspace at the dawn of the 21st century can no longer position itself in a utopian void of seamless possibilities.”
while I read this my wife sleeps in front of the TV. My lover/mistress flirted with it but had no time or patience…women don’t interact with the technolgy in teh same way. For them its slower, the clock cycles don’t tick so fast Nut gatherers and hunters…all this technology and we are only just out of the jungle
nut gatherers? you can’t be serious.
I don’t buy the nut gatherers thing either. It’s just not supportedf much by archaeology or anthropology. BUt there is something of a gender difference in how people respond to games.
View all comments in the book
(All comments will be moderated)
I know there are alot of people who are used to reading this sort of style of writing, and I find it beautiful in many ways, but here is an example of a place where I think your unencumbered prose would have been illuminated by a real world reference. Is there something spcific in a game that illustrates what the last sentence so nicely describes?
Sorry, I confused the issue by saying “real world”. I am just looking for an example from a game. I think it would help the reader if you had more of these.
good point — as you see it is as yet a pretty short and undeveloped paragraph
View all comments in the book
(All comments will be moderated)
I’m fascinated by the compulsive need to fix typos here. Almost all the others I’ve come across have been pointed out by someone, but at last, space for me! Line 2: “rather than,” rather than “rather that.”
What is this all about, this desire to edit rather than interact?
dunno, but its useful for me, so i’m grateful to readers for pointing them out.
sure… but “Inreract” is a misnomer, another word for edit. The correct-typo instinct anyway is global… words are shameless, on their own without effect.
Conversely, the urge to correct typos is as you say … nuerotic. But then finding the F**ckers (words) to begin with is no different.
It’s like where Buddha died because his followers forgot to ask him to live… and other petty squabbles.
M
View all comments in the book
(All comments will be moderated)
I’m just flipping around the book, loving this awesome interface (and what I’ve read so far).
A question — isn’t the CIVIII encyclopeida called the Civilopedia, not the Cyclopedia? Is this a typo or poetic license?
I’ll have to check that — don’t have the game to hand. Thanks!
… and there is a typo in that same sentence- “for to a parallel world.”
View all comments in the book
(All comments will be moderated)
(All comments will be moderated)